The UK’s first robot to fight for justice in a murder trial is to be sent to trial in the US
The first robot that can help convict a murderer is being sent to the US.
A judge at the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal ruled in a case brought by a woman that the company that made the robot Kamala, should be allowed to use its artificial intelligence to convict the woman of murdering her former boyfriend.
The judge said that the robot can be used to find the motive for the crime, and to determine if there was probable cause for the murder.
Kammala is used in criminal trials, but in the case of Kathleen Lacy, who had killed her former partner and was charged with first-degree murder, the judge ruled that the bot was too slow to determine the motive.
“The defendant does not show that the defendant was aware of her conduct or was in a position to change it in any way,” the 9 th Circuit Court said.
In the decision, the 9 st Circuit said the robot could be used “in the courtroom as a forensic expert, and not as a judge or jury.”
“It has not been proven that the defendants had any reasonable basis for their actions,” the court said.
“In the absence of such a reasonable basis, the defendant must be convicted by the court of law.”
Kammalas first trial began on Tuesday after the 9 Circuit ruled that it could use the robot to prove the crime.
The 9 th Circut also said the decision to use the device would allow other cases to proceed as well, and that the decision was “fairly clear” in its ruling.
The decision came after Lacy appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, which last year tried to prevent the robot from being used to convict a black man for killing a white woman in New York City.
The Supreme Court ruled in January that it was unconstitutional for the Supreme Courts to prohibit the use of a robot to try people accused of crimes.
Lacy’s case was argued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), as well as the Center for Biological Diversity and Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
In their case, the NAACP argued that using the robot “would not allow us to get to the heart of the issue at hand,” as it would “create an entirely new legal problem that could require a new trial.”
The ACLU argued that the 9 Circuit ruling “cannot be interpreted to mean that we should ignore the problems created by the use of robots for trial by jury.”
The NAACP added that “We urge the Supreme Court to strike down this unconstitutional ruling and protect the rights of all people to be free from the dangers of automation and the potential for wrongful convictions.”
In a statement, the ACLU said the court’s decision “should serve as a wakeup call for the states that continue to rely on autonomous procedures that violate their own constitutional protections.”
“Instead of using autonomy to prosecute individuals for crimes that cannot be proved in court, they should use it to bring those who are not innocent to justice,” the statement said.
The 9 th Circuit’s decision comes after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who has recently said he would use the Robocar to bring “the whole state to a standstill” and use it on the roads, said that it is “a step in the right direction.”
“We’re getting close, and we’re gonna get to zero,” Christie told CNN.
“The next step is to get that robot on the road.”
Follow US News from CBS News and the CBS Interactive entertainment network on Twitter.